Are tourists safe in
North Korea – or unwitting pawns in the regime's game?
Latest detention of
American citizen prompts scrutiny on DPRK travel industry and the tours
operating there
An American university student’s recent arrest
in North Korea has rekindled questions about whether US tourists who visit the
country are unwittingly offering themselves up as valuable pawns in Pyongyang’s
political game.
The detention of
Otto Warmbier, a 21-year-old University of Virginia economics student who spent
his christmas holiday in North Korea, comes at a particularly difficult time in
relations between the US and DPRK.
North Korea claims
it has arrested US student for 'hostile act'
Read more
Just days after his
detention in early January the North conducted what it said was its first
H-bomb test, an act of provocation that further isolated the country from the
international community.
According to
Warmbier’s travel agency, Young Pioneer Tours, the student was almost boarding
his plane home when North Korean officials pulled him aside and arrested him
for allegedly committing a “hostile act” against the state.
Authorities later
said Warmbier is under investigation after he acted with the “tacit connivance
of the US government and under its manipulation.”
Troy Collings,
director of Young Pioneer tours, said they couldn’t comment on the case but
emphasised that “every arrest [of a tourist ] that has occurred has, to our
knowledge, been with context.”
Despite Warmbier’s
detention none of the major North Korean travel agencies have cancelled their
upcoming trips, stressing that almost all Americans who travel to the DPRK
return home without incident.
The US state
department currently “strongly recommends against all travel to the DPRK” due
to the “risk of arrest and long-term detention due to the DPRK’s inconsistent
application of its criminal laws.”
Young Pioneer Tours
says Warmbier is the first of its 7,000 clients over the past eight years to
face arrest.
New Jersey-based Uri
Tours also said that it has had only one such case in 15 years – American
Matthew Miller, who ripped up his tourist visa on arrival in what he has said
was a deliberate attempt to get arrested.
“We serve about
1,000 travellers per year on average to the DPRK,” Uri Tours CEO, Andrea Lee,
said. “We’ve taken many American tourists and with the exception of Matthew
Miller, they’ve all returned safely with positive feedback.”
About 40% of the
company’s travel clients are American, but Lee said American visitors are not
treated differently from other tourists.
“Critics claim that
tourism is an avenue for the DPRK government to arrest Americans as political
hostages. However, this has not been our experience,” she said.
Analysis Tourism or
propaganda: how ethical is your North Korean holiday?
Kim Jong-un wants
two million foreign visitors a year by 2020, but debate rages over whether
travellers are a force for good – or merely prop up the regime
Political
negotiation
As the two countries
have no diplomatic relations, senior US officials are often required to fly to
North Korea to personally negotiate the release of their citizens.
Former president
Bill Clinton was forced to make a visit to Pyongyang to secure the release of
American journalists Euna Lee and Laura Ling in 2009. Both had crossed the
border from China illegally.
Jeffrey Fowle was
also detained for six months in 2014 for leaving a bible in a local club – an
act considered to be a criminal offence in the DPRK. He was only let go after
US spy chief James Clapper negotiated his release alongside the Korean-American
missionary, Kenneth Bae.
Response:
This article highlights a problem that has been happening. Additionally, with the North Korean videos we have recently been watching, this gives us more perspective. The tone of this article is quite inconsistent because the content of the article varies from the title. The title makes it sound like the article is going to describe that all the tourists North Korea are only allowed into the country for the government's purpose. However, the article basically stated that the tourists who get arrested are an anomaly. Those people are committing crimes blatantly against North Korea. However, North Korea is very inconsistent on how arrest people, which creates danger for anyone who willingly enters North Korea. The inconsistency of the article gives this article unclear bias. Generally, I think the bias is directed towards that North Korea is essentially okay to go with special permission, of course.
This article highlights a problem that has been happening. Additionally, with the North Korean videos we have recently been watching, this gives us more perspective. The tone of this article is quite inconsistent because the content of the article varies from the title. The title makes it sound like the article is going to describe that all the tourists North Korea are only allowed into the country for the government's purpose. However, the article basically stated that the tourists who get arrested are an anomaly. Those people are committing crimes blatantly against North Korea. However, North Korea is very inconsistent on how arrest people, which creates danger for anyone who willingly enters North Korea. The inconsistency of the article gives this article unclear bias. Generally, I think the bias is directed towards that North Korea is essentially okay to go with special permission, of course.
Cite:
Talmadge, Eric. "Are Tourists Safe in North Korea – or Unwitting Pawns in the Regime's Game?" Theguardian. Guardian News and Media Limited, 28 Jan. 2016. Web. 2 Feb. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment